The Meaning of Art and the Transmission of Feelings

At the Tate Modern, it’s common to see long queues, crowded rooms, and people taking photographs in front of the artworks. Art has become a popular experience. Many now visit galleries as they might visit a landmark, to be part of something familiar, social, and shared. The popularity is undeniable. What is less clear is what it means. Does this enthusiasm show that art is thriving, or does it suggest that something essential is being replaced by entertainment?

Art today often functions as part of our social life. It provides a setting for meeting, sharing, and taking part in something collective. This isn’t necessarily wrong, but it can obscure the deeper purpose of art. The real value of art lies not in its popularity or its spectacle, but in its capacity to communicate feeling, to transmit something human from one person to another.

Art as Communication

Art is often described in terms of beauty, originality, or skill, but its central purpose is communication. Art succeeds when it passes a feeling from the artist to the viewer. A painting, sculpture, or piece of music becomes a bridge between two minds separated by time and place.

This idea is not new. Tolstoy once described art as the transmission of feeling, the idea that an artist experiences an emotion and, through their work, makes it possible for others to feel it too. Language allows us to share thoughts; art allows us to share feelings. The moment you recognise the emotion within a work, you are taking part in that exchange.

Art and Entertainment

To understand what art is, it helps to see what it is not. Art and entertainment often overlap, but they have different aims. Entertainment seeks to amuse, to distract, and to please. Art seeks to connect, to engage, and sometimes to challenge.

Entertainment gives us what we want; art gives us what we need. The first offers escape; the second invites reflection. In entertainment, the audience can remain comfortable. In art, the audience is often asked to pay attention and to feel something genuine, even if it is difficult or unfamiliar. Yet the divide between the two is not absolute. Much of the best contemporary visual art bridges this gap, combining clarity and depth. The same can be said for some of the most successful films, where entertainment and art work together to create both pleasure and insight.

The Ritual of Viewing

Nowhere is this tension between art and entertainment more visible than in the modern museum. Many people visit museums today for reasons closer to entertainment than communication. The experience itself, the building, the event, the photograph, becomes the focus. We perform the act of looking at art without necessarily engaging with it. A photograph taken in front of a painting, often never looked at again, becomes a record of a moment that was never truly experienced. Art takes time to see. Yet we often move too quickly, glancing at static works of art, or dividing our attention between two screens when watching a video. The museum visit can easily become a social ritual rather than an encounter with meaning.

When art is confused with entertainment, it begins to lose part of its true purpose. It can become a commodity or a form of status, something to display or document rather than experience. The artwork becomes a token of social performance rather than a site of connection. The energy of attention shifts away from the work itself and toward the act of recording the engagement. What was once an opportunity for a private conversation between the artwork and the viewer, a silent reflective moment, becomes more performative. The viewer becomes dominant.

This change doesn’t come from a lack of interest. The crowds prove there is a strong desire for what art represents, a search for meaning, connection, and shared experience. What is often missing is depth. The culture surrounding art encourages speed and novelty, when most art requires time, contemplation, and stillness.

To feel what an artwork communicates, we must slow down. We need to move beyond the idea of consuming art and toward the idea of participating in it.

Connection

When a work of art succeeds, a deeper connection happens between the artist and the viewer. We sense the artist’s intention behind it. We recognise a profound feeling that belongs to someone else but also feels close to our own. In that moment, art performs its true function: it creates a deep connection between people.

The popularity of art museums is not empty; it shows that people still seek this experience. But the meaning of art cannot be measured by attendance or spectacle. It depends on attention, on whether we are open to receiving what the artist has tried to share. When we take the time to look, we see more. A local museum or gallery often holds artworks we can return to, getting to know them slowly, over time. This kind of familiarity allows for genuine connection, something deeper than the brief encounter of a distant, once-in-a-lifetime visit. We can start and continue a conversation over time.

As we change, our experience of the art we get to know also changes. One reflects the other.

The next time you find yourself in front of an artwork, the question is simple: am I being entertained, or am I communicating? Am I looking for distraction, or connection?

The meaning of art begins with that distinction. It asks us not only to look, but to see; not only to think, but to feel, and to recognise that this is the reason art continues to matter.

The Habit of Drawing

For details of my new book, The Habit of Drawing Fast and Slow, please visit www.circlelineartschool.com/the-habit-of-drawing.

Subscribe to Circle Line Notes for new posts by email.